CO129-550-7 Rex v. Ng Loi Yuen- appeal to Privy Council 1-1-1934 - 31-12-1934 — Page 68

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

-8-

68

Hailsham XIII p.564.

Phipsonm7th Edition p.180

p.2. Summing up Warning of C. J.

6-7

Payne's case

3 C.A. 262.

Objection to Mrs. F's evidence could have been taken when Crown

case closed.

Sanders 14 C. A. p.10.

do.

Cairns

20 C.A. p.44.

Objection must be taken at time.

Vide also Wyman's case 13 C. A. R. 165.

Reference to Mary Pine prejudiced defence.

18th Edition Roscoe 121 Rule of law and 297 Inadmissable evidence

This relates to evidence. The point is on a mere statement

by Counsel statement corroborated or contradicted.

Lucas 1 C.A. p.234 p. 235.

Accidental mention

and warning sufficient.

Stratton's case 3 C.A. p. 259.

No substantial miscarriage of justice.

Sullivan 3 C.A. p.265

4 C.A. 233

RichAman

Lo ates 5 C.. p.193

Stroud 7 C.A. p.38

Kurash 11 CA. p.166

Driscoll and others

Last para of judgment.

No miscarriage.

do.

Similar.

Curing by warning.

20 C. A. p.162 Statements by counsel.

In this case made two days before verdict.

Counsel in closing speeches warned jury also judge p.l.

Summing up.

Misdirection

Hailsham p.170 para.247 and 275 para.402.

Law

Keating 2 C.A. p.61.

Putting D's case to jury.

Mowbray 8 C. A. p.9. Counsel should have called judge 's

attention to a misstatement in summing up at the time.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.